Congress to Examine ATF’s 1.4 Billion Pages of Closed-Dealer Gun Records on Nov. 18

November 15, 2026 — Informational legal-news update. Facts in this article are current as of November 15, 2026.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement will hold a hearing on Wednesday, November 18, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. ET in room 2154 of the Rayburn House Office Building. The title, set out in an official November 11 notice from Chairman James Comer and on the committee’s hearing page, is “Oversight of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ Out-of-Business Records Retention Practices.” The subcommittee is chaired by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.).

A hearing is not a vote, and it changes no statute or regulation. It is a chance to put ATF’s closed-dealer records on the public record.

What the law requires

When a federally licensed firearms business shuts down for good, federal law requires it to send its required records to the Attorney General within 30 days. If a successor licensee takes over the business, the records go to the successor instead. That rule is in 18 U.S.C. § 923(g)(4). The records include Form 4473s and acquisition-and-disposition books. ATF stores out-of-business records at the National Tracing Center’s Out-of-Business Records Center in Martinsburg, West Virginia.

How large is the archive?

A September 24, 2026, letter from eight Republican senators, led by Sen. James Risch (R-Idaho), cites a figure of 1,414,088,513 records in the Martinsburg holdings. A November 13 committee staff memo for this hearing describes the system as containing “over 1.4 billion pages of sales records.” In its May 2026 proposed rule, ATF itself said that as of June 11, 2025, the National Tracing Center held approximately 1.3 billion images of records and was receiving about 6.8 million out-of-business records a month.

ATF says the digitized files are used for crime-gun tracing and “are not searchable by an individual’s name or other personal identifiers or through character recognition.” That statement comes from the proposed rule. Critics, including the senators who wrote the September letter, argue that the archive functions as a national gun registry in practice.

The Firearm Owners’ Protection Act of 1986, codified in part at 18 U.S.C. § 926(a), provides that no rule or regulation issued after the Act’s enactment may require that “any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established.” Appropriations provisions have also restricted ATF from consolidating licensee records and from electronically retrieving out-of-business records by name or personal identification code. This article does not decide whether the current archive violates those provisions. That is a question for Congress, the Justice Department, and the courts.

A proposed rule, not a final one

On May 6, 2026, ATF published a notice of proposed rulemaking, RIN 1140-AA95, in the Federal Register. The proposal would replace indefinite retention of many dealer records, and of the records the National Tracing Center receives, with a period of either 20 or 30 years. It is a proposal. Comments closed on August 4, 2026. The rule has not been finalized.

The proposed text matters. For dealers, the clock would generally run “from the date on which they sell or otherwise dispose of a firearm.” For records sent to ATF after a dealer closes, the agency “will retain records … for no longer than 20 [or 30] years from the date they receive the records.” Those periods would not run at the same time. A record kept by a dealer for 30 years and then transferred to ATF could be held for another 30 years—about 60 years in all. Certain importer and manufacturer acquisition records would remain subject to indefinite retention.

Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation made that point in comments filed June 2, 2026. They argued that ATF’s receipt of out-of-business records should not restart the retention clock, and they objected to any period longer than 20 years.

The Senate letter

On September 24, eight Republican senators led by Sen. Risch asked Attorney General Todd Blanche to direct an independent investigation of the Martinsburg database, order the destruction of any records kept in violation of the 1986 Act and appropriations restrictions, and ensure that any final retention rule complies with those prohibitions. Joining Risch were Sens. Mike Crapo, Marsha Blackburn, Ted Budd, Tom Cotton, Steve Daines, Cindy Hyde-Smith, and Pete Ricketts. The letter was also copied to ATF Director Robert Cekada. This article does not report whether the Attorney General has answered.

Who is scheduled to testify

As of November 15, 2026, the House committee repository and the November 13 staff memo list two witnesses: Aidan Johnston, director of federal affairs at Gun Owners of America, and Wally Nelson, a retired ATF deputy assistant director. This article does not speculate about additional witnesses or about what they will say.

What it means for Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania has no separate role in this federal archive, but the records themselves can include Pennsylvania sales. Anyone who has bought a firearm from a licensed dealer filled out a Form 4473. If that dealer later closed without a successor, those required records may now be in the National Tracing Center’s collection. The November 18 hearing is an opportunity to hear, on the record, how ATF stores and uses those files. It does not change the law.

Bottom line: The House Oversight Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement will hold a hearing on November 18, 2026, on ATF’s out-of-business records. A Senate letter cites 1,414,088,513 records in the archive; ATF’s May proposal put the collection at about 1.3 billion images as of mid-2025. The Firearm Owners’ Protection Act bars a system of registration, and critics say the archive functions as one. A proposed ATF rule would replace indefinite retention with 20- or 30-year periods, but the clock would start again when ATF receives a closed dealer’s records. The hearing changes no law, and the rule is not final.

Sources

This article is general information, not legal advice. It is not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney about your specific situation. Check current federal, state, and local law. Sources reviewed November 15, 2026 (ET).

Tags: ATF, Federal Law, Pennsylvania, Second Amendment

x.comfacebook.comE-mail